Posts Tagged ‘Tutor’

Wind Fuel Aids The Earth And Business!

July 20th, 2010

Having taught as an academic/tutor, I have written this article as a part of a series for my students:

An example of making use of turbines by business is J. Sainsbury PLC in Greenwich. In this case they have two wind turbines at the front of their commercial structure. The Sainsbury?s logo has been placed on a banner suspended from each pylon thus saving money as less signs will be required elsewhere. Solar panels are also attached to each post to further incrconstain the saving. The turbines will take approximately 25 years to pay for themselves, however the solar panels will help constain that and the fact that the posts are applied to suspend banners means that the original costs are not in fact so great.

From the example above it is not clear why more businesses are using wind turbines but it is clear why they are not to be applied on private properties.

A brief tutorial of the plans for wind turbines to be incorporated in modern structures would include; the plans for a 42 story Multiplex tower in Elephant and Castle were published to local residents this month. The 147 metre tower will include 408 inhabited buildings and will include five stories of retail space for outlets. In the top of the tower three wind turbines will be inset and the aim is to light the whole structure thereby cutting the power bills by 40%. The benefits of these turbines are clear and by incorporating them into the plans limits the costs as the need of masts that would otherwise have to be erected is removed. Regeneration of the area is expected to be completed by 2014.

The original design of a wind turbine is very simple but there are a few problems with the design which have been solved and these are outlined below:

Variable output
The wind speed varies and therefore this concludes in a varying of the electrical output of the turbine. This is solved very easily by using the power to charge a rechargeable battery which is then employed to provide power to the load. Power cuts would be problematic.

The energy produced from wind turbines must be switched off and therefore wasted when the power from the UK grid is cut therefore the advantage that you would think you would get of back-up fuel when the UK grid fails does not exist. The reason for this is that if an engineer is sent out to fix downed power lines then he would be electrocuted if a wind turbine were still providing fuel to the UK grid.

High winds:
In very high winds the blades would move too fast and the generator would get too hot and equipment may not be able to take the vast forces acting on it. In previous designs of the turbine a cut off system was designed to stop the blades in high winds but that was grossly inefficient. Some designs of wind energised turbines include blades which begin to fold away in high winds using a much improved system. Such engineering designs were brought to my attention by a fellow academic tutor.

Sonofusion May Well Save The Earth?

July 19th, 2010

In constructing the below article, a number of academics/tutors/teachers were consulted.

The competition to find a revolutionary sustainable energy source is becoming increasingly important as terrifying projections on those remaining are made. Nuclear fusion has proved to produce sizeable energy outputs but only with methods requiring more energy than produced.

The general concencus from the academics/tutors/teachers was that:
When claims to achieving nuclear fusion relatively easily from sound waves concentrated scrutiny and criticism was inevitable. R.P.Taleyarkhan et al. published the original papers outlining exactly these results in 2002 that have since been dismissed by various scientists.

Taleyarkhan et al. claims to produce fusion using sonofusion, the phenomena sonoluminescence (SL) under certain conditions. SL is when high velocity ultra sonic waves are focused onto minute bubbles inside a liquid, the vibrations from the sound cause the bubble to collapse and emit a flash of light. The experiments performed in involve creating sonoluminescence in deuterated acetone with unique bubbles, produced using a pulse of neutrons. These demonstrated more stable than small air bubbles already present in the liquid, which enabled extreme pressure and temperature conditions.

If D-D fusion is observed the outputs of tritium and neutrons should be equal and occur simultaneously with the production of light. However, one source accepts that the results from the experiments don?t show this, with a tritium neutron ratio of a maximum 10:1, and they reason this with:

1)?Neutron energy losses by scattering in the test chamber?

2) ?Reduced detections efficiency for sizeable-angle knock-ons from 2.5MeV neutrons?

3) ?Possible fluctuations in T concentration in the acetone?

M.J.Saltmarsh and D.Shapira re-produced the experiment and stated that these reasons would only allow a 2:1 which doesn?t make possible for the 10:1 ratio described in. They also queried the discrepancy in timing of the light from SL and the neutrons noted from the acclaimed sonofusion. Hinting the neutron counts were not harvested in the SL but were from background noise and muddled with the neutrons being used to form the bubbles.

In answer to this report Taleyarkhan et al. said didn?t account for experimental differences and that they had mistaken the data in their calculations. Taleyarkin et al. eventually published an additional article in 2004 citing that the previous results had been repeated with the addition of neutron production on later cycles in the bubble implosions.

In 2005 the BBC weighed in, employing S.Putterman to do an independent experiment Puttermans results produced absolutely no correlation between the timing of the SL flashes and the neutron signals and so concluded in disagreement.

The moral side of this issue is also of huge interest, with Taleyarkhan being accused by Dr.Suslick for scientific misconduct in 2006. This was not further followed when a new report of Taleyarkhans results being repeated by E.Forringer et al was published later that year. However on September 10th 2007 it was declared more investigation was being reinitiated due to several issues including the repeated results being conducted in Taleyarkhan?s own labs.

The academics/tutors/teachers concluded that:
The mystery over sonofusion can be uncovered with extra experimentation and has the potential to revolutionise the modern world.